321
W. Cimade
Une question raised in the prefer refereed to by her. Polecanor
related to the amount of salary for (samours) pension purposes. His
despatch raises not only that quation, but also the adequacy ofoth Talary to the cost of living
entertaining.
་
With regard to the latter, dit
Illaws to the theat it will be sufficient
to refer to the despatch suggesting
Aar
Akame action lepery into bolarin generally on
which that of the Governor will
amsony which
be considered.
with regard to the former question Joan
porn tur Ebden
I understand that it is not intended
to take
any
action
Sanying I bel there ground Saint-
bring that the Transury are willing
to consider the salary as being £5000,
Ser
to take
and that in fact it is so by law. however Wittle the Governor may actualy receive. I can only rifent may decided
prision that it is not
هست ، سما
theat of
y
Governors && others on
(+
were, the
the livid List)
would be fully cutitled to have their
Jaleries paid by the browns Agents
We lived List.
at the batas mentioned in
I not be how we cave say to the Sovernor "Your salary
is £5000
but only
not receive that mum but.
but
you
wire o
a costar
Unsuber Umember of dollars" the answer is
"thinkay salary is not ₤5000"
WG.
We Meade
খ
Korway 89
10. S. 85
As regards the Pension guation it is being disinfeed on the Mauritius Grumoin The Papers
cate
are now with Sir R.Herbert. Auvais That decision.
As regards the general an Muffing of his salary aurait the result of the queerat suging
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.